Prevalence and Opportunistic Intervention †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Prevalence and Opportunistic Intervention. Answer: Introduction: The article contains a clear statement of the aims of the research. The Goal of the Research was to establish a grounded theory to define and describe the manner in which the needs of the RACFs residents of Australia are decided, distributed and communicated (Flick, 2014). The objective of the research is relevant because little research has been done on the practical and daily ethical issues the personal care assistants and nurses who care for the residents undergo and whether they enact the rights of the residents such as the right to make informed choices regarding their care Halldorsdottir and Karlsdottir (2011) and independence of the residents (Australian Human Rights Commission, 2012). This research topic is significant because the RACFs are a select group of people that needs both continence and incontinence care because of their inability to even perform necessary activities like disposing of fecal matter (Economics, 2013). Yes. The research methodology is appropriate because the three objectives of the research are geared towards the ethical issues that the respondents (nurses and personal care PCA assistants) undergo while carrying out their duty (Supino and Borer, 2012). For instance, it explores the view of the nurses and PCAs about service provision, their perception of continence and incontinence care and a practical field observation on their reaction towards the care needs of the continence care of the residents in public management. Additionally, qualitative research is the best methodology for realizing the research objective because the study concerns the ethical challenges that the respondents face while on duty. This is because the nature of the study is that it requires both the perception of the nurses and a practical observation of them while at work (Speziale et al., 2011). Appropriateness of the Research Design No. The research design was not appropriate because the researchers havent discussed the reason for settling on the method of grounded theory (Bechhofer and Paterson, 2012). But instead, they have described how the method is carried out and not why they chose to use it. Yes. The procedure for the recruitment of the respondents was appropriate because the researchers describe on how they arrived at the selected participants (Saunders, 2012). The selection was done on the basis of experience in providing, monitoring or evaluating continence care in the RACF of Australia. The researchers adopted this criterion of selection because such participants were the most appropriate in providing the knowledge relevant for the research. However, the authors do not outline whether any respondents of interest declined to participate in the study. Yes. Data collection was carried out in a manner that addressed the research problem because the article is clear on how they gathered data through formal, semi-structured, in-depth interviews and open-ended methods. Also, the researchers did justify the reason for the data collection methods used. For instance, they are in line with the grounded theory Charmaz and Belgrave (2012) and the type of the interview questions and sampling frame were derived from the incipient analysis and was arrived at on the basis of prior sources of data. However, the researchers do not explicitly provide for how the interview method was conducted, any data modification during the research and any data saturation, but provide an in-depth process on how the observations were carried out. Yes, the relationship between the respondents and the researchers is considered in the research. First because the formulation of the research objectives was influenced by the existing mind gap from extant literature and the development of a grounded theory with an aim of examining how the continence needs of the residents of RACF are decided, conveyed and communicated. Also, data collection by observation was done from a discrete distance away from the residence of the staff activity and the joint areas of every facility during normal routines and interaction between the residents and employees. This ensured that their individual role did not influence the formulation of the research objectives and data collection (Christensen et al., 2011). Furthermore, the choice of location was justified by the researcher in that it consisted of a variety of staff namely RN, EN and PCA, had a large population of dependent residents some of which suffered from dementia (Fowler, 2013). Consideration of Ethical Issues No, the article doesnt highlight any ethical issues during research. This is because it doesnt provide details of whether the participants were first informed of the details of the research before commencement. Furthermore, the researchers have not discussed any issues to do with confidentiality based on the effects of the respondents participating in the study. The study doesnt also indicate whether an express permission was granted from the ethics committee. Data analysis was sufficiently rigorous because there is a detailed process of analysis where the researchers used the NVivo 9 software to key in data and analyse (Bazeley and Jackson, 2013). The data techniques used to analyse the data was open coding, theoretical coding and discriminate coding which was simultaneous with data generation and analysis. The texts were assigned single codes each or more for data description. At the same time, the data from the memos was developed based on the rising concepts from the coded data management. To ensure consistency and data relevancy of the emerging social problems and processes were revealed, all the coding phases were done by matching code-to-code, event-to-event and group-to-group (Bazeley and Jackson, 2013). However, the researcher do not explain how presented data was selected from the initial sample to illustrate the process of analysis, but instead, they provide a detailed process of how the data analysis was carried out. There is a lso the insufficiency of data to back-up the outcomes because the researchers only provide a summary of the outcomes without the corresponding percentages or numerical data to support their conclusions. The research also assumes that there was no contradictory data because its not mentioned anywhere in the article. This contradicts the principles of research which always allows a margin of error (Schultz, 2011). Lastly, the researchers impliedly considered their influence during the selection and analysis of data for presentation by wholly relying on the principles of data entry and coding using the NVivo 9 software program. Yes, the research findings are explicitly explained because the study led to the establishment of a theory regarding the delivery of general care in RACFs. The theory is divided into two parts namely the caring against odds and weathering constraints. The former is about the primary challenges faced by the staff of RACF while at work and the latter is a description of the responses of the staff to the challenges. Furthermore, the research findings have been categorised into four and discussed in detail. However, the discussion doesnt consist of contradicting arguments against the researcher. The researchers do not discuss the credibility of their outcomes. Yes, the research is valuable because the researchers state that it is the first research to provide a detailed analysis of an exceptional and challenging kind of the continence care provided in the setting of a RACF from the direct views of the staff. This is discussed in relation to the existing literature on a related research (Visser et al.,2012; Strickland, 2014; Ng et al., 2014; and Xu et al., 2013). However, the article doesnt identify any field for further study and how the study outcomes can be applicable to other populations. References Australian Human Rights Commission, 2012. Human rights approach to ageing and health: respect and choice.Sydney: Australian Human Rights Commission. Bazeley, P. and Jackson, K. eds., 2013.Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. Sage Publications Limited. Bechhofer, F. and Paterson, L., 2012.Principles of research design in the social sciences. Routledge. Charmaz, K. and Belgrave, L., 2012. Qualitative interviewing and grounded theory analysis.The SAGE handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft,2, pp.347-365. Christensen, L.B., Johnson, B., Turner, L.A. and Christensen, L.B., 2011. Research methods, design, and analysis. Economics, D.A., 2013. the Continence Foundation of Australia. The economic impact of incontinence in Australia. Continence Foundation of Australia, 2011. Flick, U., 2014.An introduction to qualitative research. Sage. Fowler Jr, F.J., 2013.Survey research methods. Sage publications. Halldorsdottir, S. and Karlsdottir, S.I., 2011. The primacy of the good midwife in midwifery services: an evolving theory of professionalism in midwifery.Scandinavian journal of caring sciences,25(4), pp.806-817. Ng, S.F., Lok, M.K., Pang, S.M. and Wun, Y.T., 2014. Stress urinary incontinence in younger women in primary care: prevalence and opportunistic intervention.Journal of Women's Health,23(1), pp.65-68. Saunders, M.N., 2012. Choosing research participants.Qualitative organizational research: Core methods and current challenges, pp.35-52. Schultz, K., 2011.Being wrong: Adventures in the margin of error. Granta Books. Speziale, H.S., Streubert, H.J. and Carpenter, D.R., 2011.Qualitative research in nursing: Advancing the humanistic imperative. Lippincott Williams Wilkins. Strickland, R., 2014. Reasons for not seeking care for urinary incontinence in older community-dwelling women: a contemporary review.Urologic nursing,34(2), p.63. Supino, P.G. and Borer, J.S. eds., 2012.Principles of research methodology: A guide for clinical investigators. Springer Science Business Media. Visser, E., de Bock, G.H., Kollen, B.J., Meijerink, M., Berger, M.Y. and Dekker, J.H., 2012. Systematic screening for urinary incontinence in older women: Who could benefit from it?.Scandinavian journal of primary health care,30(1), pp.21-28. Xu, D., Wang, X., Li, J. and Wang, K., 2015. The mediating effect of bothersomeurinary incontinence on help?seeking intentions among community?dwelling women.Journal of advanced nursing,71(2), pp.315-325.